The book of songs "creative" debate

The book of songs "creative" debate

Alas! How can I say? How do individual editors has also been under the influence of some people?
My "the book of ideas" is creative and modern poetry! Or, rather, is under the guidance of the spirit in the poetry of realism round unique ideas comes from. Not on the book of the original text of "translation", not "translation", and certainly not "record". It can occur and the poetry of the original contact or contact does not occur and the poetry of the original.
With a corresponding chapter of the songs as "creative" subtitle, was ten years ago, because I study at a time when the book of songs, is a country-by-article commentary of the book, which corresponds to the book of the original article-by-"creative". This subtitle, where "Remembrance" more than "creative" poetry in own needs (referring to those seemingly out of the book of the independent creation of the original).
Relevant chapter of the book, author of "creative" is essentially a "touch" or the "raised and enlightening"! Was "inspired" author related creation of "trigger an" Oh, it is like the role of Chinese medicine "guiding drug child". But the "guiding drug child" is not a "medicine".
Because aware of this, the author of "creative" after work on the 100 first, consciously put aside the book of the original, follows the realism of the poetry, independently conducted self-perspective in the poetry of reality. Basically it is proud to say that these relations and the poetry of the original text, not just authors creative labor of poetry, but also better inherit the essence of the songs for thousands of years--the poetry of realism! Although the authors do not good, this is the inheritance of Chinese poetry "wind,